information has not been approved by the FDA diagnose, treat or cure
any disease, especially Cancer. Dr. Tuttle does NOT cure,
treat, or claim to cure or treat Cancer, because Dr. Tuttle loves his
wife and kids and does NOT want to go to prison.
American Cancer Society has close financial ties to
the makers of mammography equipment. Five radiologists have served as
presidents of the American Cancer Society (ACS).
In its every move, the ACS promotes the interests of
the major manufacturers of mammogram machines and films, including
Siemens, DuPont, General Electric, Eastman Kodak, and Piker.
This bias hypes mammography, which is an avoidable cause of breast
cancer itself. A mammogram
uses ionizing radiation at a relatively high dose, which in and of
contribute to the development of breast cancer. Mammograms
expose your body to radiation that can be 1,000 times greater than that
from a chest x-ray, which we know poses a cancer risk.
“Routine mammography delivers an
unrecognized high dose of radiation, warn Drs. Epstein and Bertell. If
a woman follows the current guidelines for premenopausal screening,
over a 10 year period she would receive a total dosage of about 5 rads.
This approximates the level of exposure to radiation of a Japanese
woman one mile from the epicenter of atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima or
Just so you know, if you die of cancer or its
complications just one day after your 5 year
anniversary date, you are still statistically carried as a "successful
cure"; advertised and touted to the next cancer
patient coming in through the front door to use in their spiel to him
about his 40, or 50, or 60, or 70% chance of being
"cured" with their marvelous, patented, and expensive chemo, radiation,
and surgery treatments.
The American Cancer Society, for example, collects
upwards of $400 million per year. Very little of this money ever finds
its way to research. The majority of the money goes into investments
and towards administration – lavish salaries and perqs for the
Society’s officers and employees. A funny thing is that written into
the charter of the American Cancer Society is the clause that states
that if a cure for cancer is ever found, on that day, the Society will
disband. (The Cancer Industry) So think about it – is this an
organization that is going to be motivated to find a cure for cancer?
With billions of dollars spent each year in research,
with additional billions taken in from the cancer-related sale of
drugs, and with vote-hungry politicians promising ever-increasing
government programs, we find that, today, there are more people making
a living from cancer than dying fromit.
If the riddle were to be solved be a simple vitamin, this gigantic
commercial and political industry could be wiped out overnight.
The result is that the science of cancer therapy is not nearly as
complicated as the politics of cancer therapy
Perpetuating Fake Charities
Several G Komen Affiliates have
given Planned Parenthood
grants for breast cancer treatment as part of its efforts to support
community outreach programs.
This has garnered criticism from some pro-life
advocates because of Planned Parenthood's role as an abortion
However, Komen Affiliates do provide funds to pay for screening,
education and treatment programs in dozens of communities, which means
that in some areas, the only place that poor, uninsured or
under-insured women can receive these services are through special
programs run by Planned Parenthood.
has also been caught up in the controversy over "pinkwashing" — the use
of breast cancer and the pink ribbon by corporate
marketers, in which companies promote their products with claims to
donate a percentage of proceeds to the cause. Komen benefits greatly
from these corporate partnerships, receiving over $30 million a year
and expanding overall breast cancer awareness. But critics claim many
of these promotions are deceptive to consumers and benefit the
companies more than the charity.
I like this one best... if
you eat this garbage you truly will join the cause.... the
cause of Cancer that is.
The one shown below is a joke.. but it's not really
any more absurd than the actual one shown above. Really it's
sad when you think about it, the picture below is an obvious joke, but
many people take the KFC scam seriously.
"Stand Up To Cancer" should have aired on The Comedy
Channel -- it was all a sick joke. If there's one
thing to be learned from this telethon, it's that you probably
shouldn't get your health advice from actors.
The cancer industry is losing its propaganda battle as more and more
people discover the truth about the toxic side effects of chemotherapy
as well as the cancer preventive powers of nutrients like vitamin D and
selenium. With the science now clearly showing that chemotherapy
fails most patients and that conventional approaches to
cancer cause more harm than good, the cancer industry has resorted to
celebrity-influenced emotional theater to try to lure more people into
keeping its "someday we'll find a chemical cure" scam going.
Not present at the event, of course, were all the celebrities who have
been killed by the cancer industry, including Patrick Swayze
and Farrah Fawcett. By this time next year, that
list will undoubtedly be even larger. The Main message seemed
clear to me.
more money, but don't inform yourself
are who the elite want us model ourselves after. They want us
worship them, clamour after them and try to be like them and do what
they do. So it follows that most of the celebrities follow
message of the bogus Stand Up to Cancer Telethon. They give
and talent to "the cause" but never educate themselves and fall victim
to the cancer industry just like the rest of us.
Seriously, just think about the difference between
Patrick Swayze vs. Suzanne Summers! The following three examples were
taken from the headlines in the last month
The next potential victim is actor Michael Douglas,
who recently revealed he is suffering from stage 4 throat cancer.
Douglas will undergo eight weeks of radiation combined with two rounds
of chemotherapy. One of the most prominent side effects of chemotherapy
is, in fact, cancer! The same is true for radiation. These are both
cancer-causing interventions in human biology. Instead of boosting
immune function, they compromise it. And while they may temporarily
shrink cancer tumors, recent research reveals that they don't eliminate
cancer tumor stem cells that can easily
re-grow the tumor once the treatments are finished.
says breast cancer medication drives her to tears
Kylie Minogue says she still
suffers painful side effects, such as nausea and
headaches, from medication she takes
following her treatment for breast cancer
Minogue was acknowledged for the impact she had made
by publicly discussing her cancer diagnosis and treatment; in May 2008,
the French Cultural Minister Christine Albanel said,
"Doctors now even go as far as saying there is a 'Kylie effect' that
encourages young women to have regular checks." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kylie_minogue
Chemotherapy Drugs come from? from G. Edward Griffin lecture on his book "A World
The first use of drugs to treat cancer, however, was
in the early 20th century, although it was not originally intended for
that purpose. Mustard gas
was used as a chemical warfare agent
during World War I and was studied
further during World War II. During a
military operation in World War II, a group of people were accidentally
exposed to mustard gas and were later found to have very low white
blood cell counts.
It was reasoned that an agent that damaged the rapidly growing white
blood cells might have a similar effect on cancer. Therefore, in the
1940s, several patients with advanced lymphomas (cancers of certain
white blood cells) were given the drug by vein, rather than by
breathing the irritating gas.
Now, as a result of this, I. G. Farben and Standard
Oil did get together on this. They decided they did not want
to compete on price so the inevitable happened. After three
year's negotiations, the two cartels were married, a phrase or term,
which they themselves used. They married on November 9, 1929,
the cartels formed a super cartel and the agreement they signed
contained three primary provisions. They are:
Standard Oil received one-half ownership of the
hydrogenation rights everywhere in the world, except in Germany.
They weren't going to have to compete against that.
I. G. Farben received 546,000 shares of Standard
Oil stock, which was valued at $30 million dollars. Now that
was 1929. You can imagine what $30 million dollars would be
worth today. And ...
Both cartels agreed never to compete with each
other forever more.
They said that anytime I. G. Farben wanted to go into
a field relating to petroleum they would do so jointly with Standard
Oil and anytime that Standard Oil wanted to go into the field of
chemicals or drugs or anything like that it would do so jointly with I.
G. Farben. But above all, they must never compete and so they
were married and out of that came literally, the largest and most
powerful cartel the world has ever known, even though most people have
never heard about it.
IG Farben was the only German company in the Third
Reich that ran its own concentration camp. At least 30.000 slave
workers died in this camp; a lot more were deported to the gas
chambers. It was no coincidence that IG Farben built their giant new
plant in Auschwitz, since the workforce they used (altogether about
300.000 people) was practically for free. The Zyklon B gas, which
killed millions of Jews, Gypsies and other people was produced by IG
Farben's subsidiary company Degesch.
In Germany a growing number of people do not
understand that IG Farben's successors Bayer, BASF and Hoechst still
refuse to apologize for their misdeeds. It is hard to accept that after
the war the companies were allowed to keep IG Farben's entire property,
whereas the surviving slave workers received nothing. Until today
Bayer, BASF and Hoechst did not pay any wages to their former workers.
The Western Allies however, in
1951, split the company up into its original constituent companies. The
four largest quickly bought the smaller ones. Today only Agfa, BASF,
and Bayer remain, Hoechst having in 1999
demerged its industrial chemical operations to Celanese
AG and merged its life-sciences businesses with
Rhône-Poulenc's to form Aventis.
Rockefellars Standard Oil today is - Chevron, Exxon
The mechanism for the link up between the I. G.
Rockefeller cartel and the politics of cancer therapy was the
tax-exempt foundation. I won't go into too much of this
because there are so many side subjects here we can't afford the time
for them all, but the tax-exempt foundation was pioneered by
Rockefeller and Carnegie. These two men were (very) close
friends. They worked jointly like this through all of their
ventures, even their philanthropic ventures using the same old policy
of let's not compete. They always worked together with their
philanthropic contributions so as not to overlap or compete that way.
They got double value from their money. The
tax-exempt foundations were pioneered to accomplish three things for
To improve their public image through alleged
To preserve their vast fortunes from inheritance
taxes and income taxes which the rest of the people must pay;
To finance commercially or ideologically profitable
objectives under the guise of philanthropy.
Now, one such profitable commercial venture, which
they can research through philanthropy is drug research.
a.k.a. Junk Science
The American Cancer Society was
founded at the New York Harvard Club in 1913 by none other than John D.
RockefellerJr, which tells a
story. You would be hard pressed to find a more service to
money outfit than this, putting it politely, apart from the
AMA. King of the Pharma shills.
In 1992, The Chronicle of Philanthropy reported that
the ACS was "more interested in accumulating wealth than in saving
lives." Fund-raising appeals routinely stated that the ACS needed more
funds to support its cancer programs, all the while holding more than
$750 million in cash and real estate assets. ACS holds over 1 Billion
in net assets, with an annual budget of $380 million.
ACS quotes "As you undoubtedly know,
there is no evidence at the present time that any food or any
combination of foods specifically effects the course of any cancer in
man." -- Statement by the American Cancer Society, July 8, 1957.Dr.
Gerson's Suppressed 1946 Congressional Testimony
"Surgery, Radiation Therapy and
Chemotherapy... seldom produce a cure." -- Amercian Cancer
Society Facts & Figures 2007
MSKCC is actually composed of two intimately related
institutions. Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases,
currently led by Physician-In-Chief, Dr. Robert Wittes, provides
patient care, whose origins stemmed from a medical laboratory
established on the campus of
Cornell Medical Center and funded by John D. Rockefeller,
in 1900. The original Memorial Hospital building was constructed in
1939 by a group that included John J. Astor and his
wife, Charlotte. Between 1970 and 1973 a new memorial hospital was
built on the same site—originally donated by John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
Sloan–Kettering Institute, currently led by Dr. Thomas
Kelly, is MSKCC's basic-science research arm. The research institute
was established in 1945 with a US$4 million gift
from the foundation of Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. Half
the gift was to fund construction of a 13-story research facility and
the other half to provide annual operating expenses.
Charles F. Kettering, vice president and director of research
for General Motors Corporation,
was to organize and apply modern American industrial research
techniques to cancer research.
In addition to the Sloan grant, a public campaign to
raise an additional US$3 million to US$4 million was undertaken and an
important financier who stepped in at a critical juncture was the
ongoing supporter Laurance Rockefeller,
of the philanthropic Rockefeller family.
Chemotherapy and Radiation
actually cause Cancer
It is an interesting fact that Radiation as well as
most Chemo drugs actually cause cancer. This isn't surprising
in that these therapies are directed at destroying the rapidly dividing
cells in your body, like your white blood cells (i.e. your immune
system). This is especially noteworthy because an health
immune system is the ONLY thing that keeps you from getting cancer, so
if these "therapies" destroy the immune system by default they cause
cancer. Even the ACS admits that Cancer can only develop in the
presence of a dysfunctional immune system.
This is why those taking immunosuppressive
corticosteroids get cancer and why people with AIDS die of
cancer. Your body creates between 10-100 thousand cancer
cells daily, but a health immune systems destroys them and keeps them
in check. Chemo and Radiation destroy the immune system
insuring that not only will you not recover from the cancer but that
natural remedies will fail. This is why cancer patients who
undergo Chemo live shorter than those who choose to do nothing.
Do you think after all that trouble, a drug company
wants somebody to come along with a totally cheap, available, and
natural product which has the same effect as their drug, yet with none
of the side effects? Of course not! And do you think they’ll do
everything they can both legally and politically to prevent natural
products from reaching the market? You better believe it. Two books
which best document some of the effective natural cures for cancer
which have come along in the past 75 years and have faced a tidal wave
of opposition from the FDA/AMA/Drug Trust are: Ralph Moss’s The Cancer
Industry and Richard Walters’s Options. Some of these natural cures are
still around in the US, though they are under attack. Others can only
be obtained in Mexico or Europe. And still others have been crushed out
of existence for good by the Darth Vader faction. You can do the
historical research yourself on some of the following products and
William Kelley, Hoxsey, Gaston Naessens, Max Gerson,
Kurt Donsbach, William Koch, Dr. Burzynski, Dr Blass, Dr. Loffler, Stan
Bynum, Patrick Flanagan, Microhydrin, 714x, Haelan, antineoplastins,
raw foods, live cell therapy, ozone, EDTA chelation, Laetrile, Coley
vaccines, Hydrazine sulfate, Hans Nieper, JH Tilden, whole foods
vitamins, antioxidants, colon detoxification, the Rife machine, the
black box, green foods – this is a partial list. Many names have been
lost forever. Separately or in combination, these methods and these
healers have resolved cancer in thousands of cases during the past 75
years. Some of the technology has been repressed out of existence –
other methods are quite easy. What they have in common is that they are
non-patentable generally natural methods which have no significant side
effects, and work with one common goal: strengthen the immune system.
If cancer is to be overthrown, only the body itself can do that.
The above names were not people whose first goal was
to make personal fortunes and lock their discoveries away from those
who wanted to copy them. The Drug Trust, which includes the
pharmaceutical industry, the AMA, the FDA, and even the FTC, have what
can only be described as a de facto monopoly on cancer treatment in
this company. Their goal is not curing cancer or helping people die
with dignity, or trying to discover a cure, or relieving pain, or
giving Americans a better life. Their only focus is profit, and they
have proven for the past century that there are no limits they will
observe to secure their control of what has become a $90 billion per
year industry. If this sounds harsh or paranoid, start perusing the
appended reference list and tell me what you come up with. Or try and
find one single treatment on the FDA’s “Unproven Methods” list that is
patentable as a drug.
Nobel laureate Dr. Otto Warburg discovered in the
1920s what all researchers now know: most cancers cannot exist well in
an oxygen-rich environment. Why is it that people don’t die of cancer
of the heart? Just doesn’t happen. Why not? Because that’s where the
most highly oxygenated blood is, and cancer doesn’t like oxygen.
Even more favorable for cancer is a setting of
fermentation. That’s a big word for half-digested carbohydrates
(sugar). Every bootlegger knows that as sugars ferment, they bubble.
The bubbles are the oxygen leaving. Cancer doesn’t like oxygen too
well, but it loves sugar. Starting to get the picture here?
Fermentation means half-digested. Remember we talked about all that
undigested food accumulating in the gut and in the bloodstream because
of not enough enzymes? Well, a lot of that food was carbohydrate – you
know, donuts, beer, candy, ice cream, Pepsi, bread, pastries, etc.
Worse yet, the white cells, which are supposed to
circulate as the immune system, become trapped in all this muck.
Remember what their job was? Right, to remove foreign stuff
immediately. A cancer cell is foreign stuff.
Another factor is pH. Acid-forming foods, such as the
above, make the blood more acidic. To sustain life, human blood pH must
be in the range of 7.3 – 7.45 (Guyton). Outside that range, we’re dead.
Remember, the lower the number, the more acidity. The more acid the
blood is, the less oxygen it contains, and the faster a person ages and
degenerates. There’s a major difference in oxygen even within the
narrow range of “normal’ blood pH: blood that is pH 7.3 actually has
69.4% less oxygen than 7.45 blood, according to Whang’s book, Reverse
Aging. On a practical level, this means we should do everything to keep
the pH on the high side of the range, as close as possible to 7.45, by
eating as many alkaline foods as possible. That would be, you guessed
it – live, raw foods, especially green foods.